SACRAMENTO, CA — Today, the California Senate approved SB649, which will give prosecutorial and judicial discretion to charge possession of small amounts of illicit drugs for personal use as a felony or a misdemeanor as the case warrants, by a 23-14 margin. The bill, sponsored by Sen. Mark Leno (D-San Francisco) would help reduce prison and jail overcrowding in California and potentially even provide savings to the financially-strapped courts because felony charges require setting a preliminary hearing, whereas misdemeanor offenses do not.
Despite the Democratic supermajority in the Senate, Republicans continued to oppose any changes that would reduce the amount of time in prison for personal drug use, despite the $50,000 year price tag to lock up a drug user. Now the bill moves to the Assembly, starting with a hearing in the Assembly Public Safety Committee.
“Our system is broken,” said Lynne Lyman, California state director for the Drug Policy Alliance, one of the bill sponsors. “Felony sentences don’t reduce drug use and don’t persuade users to seek treatment, but instead, impose tremendous barriers to housing, education and employment – three things we know help keep people out of our criminal justice system and successful reintegrating into their families and communities.”
On the very day that California officials have until midnight to come up with proposals to comply with the federal three-judge panel court order to reduce prison overcrowding, SB 649 provides a safe and logical opportunity to reduce the number of people incarcerated for simple drug possession. Despite Realignment,
as of December 31, 2012 there were 4,144 people in state prison for drug possession for personal use. The cost to incarcerate that many people in State Prison for a year is over $207 million. Current law provides for up to three years of prison, even for a small amount of drug for personal use.
According to state data, there are 10,000 convictions for felony drug possession for personal use each year in California. The majority of these 10,000 sentences are to felony probation. How this number would change if SB 649 were implemented remains unknown because the bill grants total discretion in charging decisions to the local prosecutor. Anticipated savings will provide greater flexibility to local governments to invest in drug treatment and mental health services, or to focus law enforcement resources on more serious offenders.
Leno’s bill, which does not apply to anyone involved in selling, manufacturing or possessing drugs for sale, will help alleviate overcrowding in county jails, ease pressure on California’s court system and result in millions of dollars in annual savings for local governments. The bill is co-sponsored by the ACLU, Drug Policy Alliance, CA-NAACP, California Public Defenders Association, William C. Velasquez Institute, Californians for Safety and Justice and Friends Committee on Legislation.
Across the country, 13 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal government already treat drug possession as a misdemeanor. Drug crime is not higher in those states. A statewide poll conducted by Tulchin Research in 2012 showed that an overwhelming majority of Californians support this type of drug sentencing reform, with 75 percent of Californians favoring investment in prevention and alternatives to jail for non-violent offenders. In addition, 62 percent of Californians agree that the penalty for possessing a small amount of illegal drugs for personal use should be reduced to a misdemeanor.
English 
Spanish