Office of Legal Affairs
Based in Oakland, California, our legal affairs team focuses on three areas:
- Legislative and initiative drafting at the state level on a range of drug policy reform issues
- Litigation and legal consulting to protect rights threatened by the drug war
- Legal training at the local, state, national, and international levels
Our Work
Briefs Related to the California SACPA Case of People v. Lovell Dove
These briefs address the applicability of apprendi to Proposition 36 regarding prosecutions conducted under the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act of 2000.
- People v. Dove, Appellant’s Opening Brief, Case No. E033907, Fourth Appellate District (California)
- People v. Dove, Appellant’s Reply Brief, Case No. E033907, Fourth Appellate District (California)
- People v. Dove, Respondent’s Brief, Case No. E033907, Fourth Appellate District (California)
Proposition 36 and its Implications for the Drug War
Contact Us
Office of Legal Affairs
1330 Broadway Suite 1426
Oakland, CA 94612
Based in Oakland, California, our legal affairs team focuses on three areas:
- Legislative and initiative drafting at the state level on a range of drug policy reform issues
- Litigation and legal consulting to protect rights threatened by the drug war
- Legal training at the local, state, national, and international levels
Our Work
Briefs Related to the California SACPA Case of People v. Lovell Dove
These briefs address the applicability of apprendi to Proposition 36 regarding prosecutions conducted under the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act of 2000.
- People v. Dove, Appellant’s Opening Brief, Case No. E033907, Fourth Appellate District (California)
- People v. Dove, Appellant’s Reply Brief, Case No. E033907, Fourth Appellate District (California)
- People v. Dove, Respondent’s Brief, Case No. E033907, Fourth Appellate District (California)
Proposition 36 and its Implications for the Drug War
Contact Us
Office of Legal Affairs
1330 Broadway Suite 1426
Oakland, CA 94612